<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Episode 22: Zombies, Time Travelers and King Arthur</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chivalrytoday.com/episode-22/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chivalrytoday.com/episode-22/</link>
	<description>Reimagining the Code of Chivalry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 13:02:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<meta xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex,follow" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Farrell</title>
		<link>http://chivalrytoday.com/episode-22/comment-page-1/#comment-74772</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Farrell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 15:24:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chivalrytoday.com/wp/?p=398#comment-74772</guid>
		<description>Very interesting perspective, Ray. Glad you found the conversation on Ep 22 thought provoking, even if you don&#039;t agree with some of the conclusions.
You&#039;re right - Twain was not a fan of the 19th century chivalric ethic, and certainly not a fan of the antebellum aristocratic class whose romantic ideals about warfare, sparked by neo-Gothic novels like Sir Walter Scott&#039;s, had brought about the suffering of the Civil War and its aftermath. But is his work &quot;A Connecticut Yankee In King Arthur&#039;s Court&quot; a critique of the wealthy class, or a dark warning that we &lt;em&gt;all&lt;/em&gt; can become desensitized and oblivious to our own hypocrisies if we do not constantly monitor our own motives and methods? (The book does end, after all, with &quot;enlightened&quot; Hank starting a war that sounds eerily reminiscent of the horrors of WWI.) I can&#039;t believe that Twain would really have objected to the core tenets of nobility - the character trait, not the social class - responsibility, personal integrity, and ethical leadership.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting perspective, Ray. Glad you found the conversation on Ep 22 thought provoking, even if you don&#8217;t agree with some of the conclusions.<br />
You&#8217;re right &#8211; Twain was not a fan of the 19th century chivalric ethic, and certainly not a fan of the antebellum aristocratic class whose romantic ideals about warfare, sparked by neo-Gothic novels like Sir Walter Scott&#8217;s, had brought about the suffering of the Civil War and its aftermath. But is his work &#8220;A Connecticut Yankee In King Arthur&#8217;s Court&#8221; a critique of the wealthy class, or a dark warning that we <em>all</em> can become desensitized and oblivious to our own hypocrisies if we do not constantly monitor our own motives and methods? (The book does end, after all, with &#8220;enlightened&#8221; Hank starting a war that sounds eerily reminiscent of the horrors of WWI.) I can&#8217;t believe that Twain would really have objected to the core tenets of nobility &#8211; the character trait, not the social class &#8211; responsibility, personal integrity, and ethical leadership.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray Ford</title>
		<link>http://chivalrytoday.com/episode-22/comment-page-1/#comment-74732</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray Ford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 06:51:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chivalrytoday.com/wp/?p=398#comment-74732</guid>
		<description>I finally listened to this podcast (sorry I&#039;m so far behind). It&#039;s a good episode. Scott Nokes is very knowledgeable, and he stuck to the subject, which is refreshing! And he mentions Buffy, so how cool is that?!?

I agree with Nokes when he says that Chivalry is composed of common ethical themes (my words not his), but as I&#039;m reading the book, I have to believe that Mark Twain is right on in his satiric mocking. The repeated &quot;They are like children&quot; is like saying they are innocent of their beliefs. I believe this. The rich, no matter what time period, are ignorant of their surroundings - that is until their heads are cut off.... In a larger sense Twain is saying &quot;we all believe on some level what we say or believe, but we&#039;re ignorant of what we actually DO.&quot; Jonathan Swift mocks society in much the same way in &quot;Gulliver&#039;s Travels.&quot; The recent &quot;Occupy Wallstreet&quot; movement differentiates the common from the wealthy. It&#039;s fun to watch the one percent try to fit their mold into the 99%&#039;s.

This is largely the reason why, IMO, that Nobility is truly a farce. I just can&#039;t believe that they - Nobility/Wealthy - are concerned about the greater good. They &quot;think&quot; they are concerned, but we see how it ends up. The Nobles have no concept of the world around them - even when piled high with dead bodies. Twain portrays it first in a comical manner then turns to dark irony, but hey it&#039;s the same thing. Look at Gaddafi. 

Anyways... this is a great topic and a great reason why Chivalry Today opens a unique and valuable perspective into our regular, mundane lives. Keep up the good work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I finally listened to this podcast (sorry I&#8217;m so far behind). It&#8217;s a good episode. Scott Nokes is very knowledgeable, and he stuck to the subject, which is refreshing! And he mentions Buffy, so how cool is that?!?</p>
<p>I agree with Nokes when he says that Chivalry is composed of common ethical themes (my words not his), but as I&#8217;m reading the book, I have to believe that Mark Twain is right on in his satiric mocking. The repeated &#8220;They are like children&#8221; is like saying they are innocent of their beliefs. I believe this. The rich, no matter what time period, are ignorant of their surroundings &#8211; that is until their heads are cut off&#8230;. In a larger sense Twain is saying &#8220;we all believe on some level what we say or believe, but we&#8217;re ignorant of what we actually DO.&#8221; Jonathan Swift mocks society in much the same way in &#8220;Gulliver&#8217;s Travels.&#8221; The recent &#8220;Occupy Wallstreet&#8221; movement differentiates the common from the wealthy. It&#8217;s fun to watch the one percent try to fit their mold into the 99%&#8217;s.</p>
<p>This is largely the reason why, IMO, that Nobility is truly a farce. I just can&#8217;t believe that they &#8211; Nobility/Wealthy &#8211; are concerned about the greater good. They &#8220;think&#8221; they are concerned, but we see how it ends up. The Nobles have no concept of the world around them &#8211; even when piled high with dead bodies. Twain portrays it first in a comical manner then turns to dark irony, but hey it&#8217;s the same thing. Look at Gaddafi. </p>
<p>Anyways&#8230; this is a great topic and a great reason why Chivalry Today opens a unique and valuable perspective into our regular, mundane lives. Keep up the good work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

