<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Return to Chivalry? &#8211; Part 1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chivalrytoday.com/return-chivalry/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chivalrytoday.com/return-chivalry/</link>
	<description>Reimagining the Code of Chivalry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 22:53:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<meta xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex,follow" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Guest</title>
		<link>http://chivalrytoday.com/return-chivalry/comment-page-1/#comment-38028</link>
		<dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 22:32:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chivalrytoday.com/wp/?p=1077#comment-38028</guid>
		<description>The problem with chivalry is that it could be shady. Guys doing almost everything for you and not having your say. And it is considered putting women on a pedestal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with chivalry is that it could be shady. Guys doing almost everything for you and not having your say. And it is considered putting women on a pedestal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

